[acidcomplex]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

http://www.edmontonhumanesociety.com/files/nokill.pdf

The terminology of “No-Kill” has been used as a way to explain
how SOME open admission shelters and rescue groups deal with
massive amounts of unwanted animals. In a world of disposable
items, animals often are abandoned or surrendered. Some facilities
see numbers higher than 75,000 animals per year and they must
euthanize animals when there is no room left to house them.

Sounds right to me

and:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

http://www.edmontonhumanesociety.com/cgi-bin/section_switch.pl?section=other&sub=HSUSnokill

Posted by Wayne Pacelle on 08 November 2007 - things change

[acidcomplex]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

http://www.edmontonhumanesociety.com/files/nokill.pdf

The terminology of “No-Kill” has been used as a way to explain
how SOME open admission shelters and rescue groups deal with
massive amounts of unwanted animals. In a world of disposable
items, animals often are abandoned or surrendered. Some facilities
see numbers higher than 75,000 animals per year and they must
euthanize animals when there is no room left to house them.

Sounds right to me, are you trying to prove my point?. Pretty sure i said they kill them

and:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

http://www.edmontonhumanesociety.com/cgi-bin/section_switch.pl?section=other&sub=HSUSnokill

Posted by Wayne Pacelle on 08 November 2007 - things change[/quote]

How about this?

http://www2.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=752ff0f8-a1b3-4771-8a07-651b862ff0d7

or this?

http://www.rushprnews.com/2008/03/13/why-will-concerned-persons-hold-on-march-15th-another-demonstration-in-front-of-the-montreal-spca/

$1:

AN ISSUE: KILLING-ON-DEMAND. Animals are entrusted to the SPCA for their protection. But CTV revealed that, with Barnoti’s knowledge, the Montreal SPCA killed-on-demand a number of dogs for the veterinary faculty at St-Hyacinte, who wanted dog bodies. CTV revealed that Barnoti fired the manager who authorized this, but also that that manager was paid an extra $15,000.

Or this?
http://www.calgaryhumane.ca/

$1:

Founded in 1922, with just a single inspector, several committed volunteers and without a shelter, we have definitely come a long way. Calgary has one of the lowest euthanasia rates in Canada

whew...or this?

http://www.yorkregion.ontariospca.ca/6-faqs.shtml

$1:

Q: What is the Ontario SPCA's policy on euthanasia?

The Ontario SPCA takes the issue of euthanasia very seriously. It is only done when there is no other humane option available. Reasons the Ontario SPCA euthanizes include: terminal illness or injury where there is no possibility of recovery, behavioural problems that pose a threat to other animals or humans, stray or feral overpopulation, disease transmission, and old age where the quality of life is impaired by major loss of functions.

[RUEZ]

acidcomplex acidcomplex:

lily lily:

Their "agenda" being the prevention of cruelty to animals?

if that was simply there agenda then id be fine but we all know its not just about that, its also about punishing the people who like eating animals and like wearing fur and harassing everyone who doesn't drink the PETA/SPCA coolaid.

Don't get me wrong it was wrong what he did but they are also wrong in using it the way they are.

I've never heard of the SPCA doing that. I think you're mistaking them for PETA.

[Yogi]

RUEZ RUEZ:

I've never heard of the SPCA doing that. I think you're mistaking them for PETA.

PETA is exactly like a certain 'member' who frequently posts on the forums. They are strictly a 'do nothing, self-important' group who are continually seeking attention by 'screaming at others that they are not doing enough, all the while not lifting a hand themselves. In other words 'ALL BLUSTER AND BULLSHIT'!

[DrCaleb]

acidcomplex acidcomplex:

Sounds right to me, are you trying to prove my point?. Pretty sure i said they kill them

Pretty sure you didn't. What you said was: "So instead of giving a kid a puppy for free that's at the end of the line they just kill it instead if someone wont pay 300 bucks for the animal."

So, once again you prove my point, and disprove your own. But then, Canada is chock full of that free speech goodness, isn't it.