news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Cost of military mission tops $3B

Canadian Content
20783news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Cost of military mission tops $3B


Misc CDN | 207813 hits | Jan 30 10:06 am | Posted by: Hyack
5 Comment

Canada's military mission in Afghanistan cost $3.1 billion up to last September, with more than half of that spent after Canadian troops established a combat toehold in Kandahar two years ago, a government report to the Commons says.

Comments

  1. by Canadian_Mind
    Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:20 am
    "The tank and helicopter acquisitions are a reaction to combat casualties the Canadians suffered after the current Kandahar mission began in February 2005, bringing Canada's total war cost to at least $7 billion so far."

    Bullshit. If we didn't buy them for this war, we'd be buying them for the next one. As such they should be treated as any other piece of military kit or hardware is when they calculate how much a war is costing us, which is usually ZIP.

  2. by avatar Streaker
    Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:48 pm
    "Canadian_Mind" said
    "The tank and helicopter acquisitions are a reaction to combat casualties the Canadians suffered after the current Kandahar mission began in February 2005, bringing Canada's total war cost to at least $7 billion so far."

    Bullshit. If we didn't buy them for this war, we'd be buying them for the next one. As such they should be treated as any other piece of military kit or hardware is when they calculate how much a war is costing us, which is usually ZIP.


    Well it certainly didn't take very long for the military to turn you into an utter moron, eh? :roll: :lol:

  3. by avatar Tricks
    Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:49 pm
    Wow...

  4. by sasquatch2
    Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:06 pm
    Canadian_Mind wrote:
    "The tank and helicopter acquisitions are a reaction to combat casualties the Canadians suffered after the current Kandahar mission began in February 2005, bringing Canada's total war cost to at least $7 billion so far."

    Bullshit. If we didn't buy them for this war, we'd be buying them for the next one. As such they should be treated as any other piece of military kit or hardware is when they calculate how much a war is costing us, which is usually ZIP.


    You are largely correct although the usual suspects yell BS when somebody posts in inconvenient truth.

    The difference between maintaining a standing army in peacetime and a fighting army in war are however considerable.

    Cost of deployment (Freight) of men and material. Replacement/repair of battle damaged/ destroyed/lost equipment. Cost to payroll for combat bonuses etc. Ammunition expended.

    However usually the entire costs are calculated in these estimates which are largely inaccurate.

    It is as ridiculous as the bills presented for Policing large events. The personell were being paid anyway and the only relevant costs are the extra fuel for vehicles and overtime. And yet the bills are calculated on the total payroll costs of personel who would be normally paid anyhoo.

  5. by avatar sandorski
    Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:47 pm
    "Canadian_Mind" said
    "The tank and helicopter acquisitions are a reaction to combat casualties the Canadians suffered after the current Kandahar mission began in February 2005, bringing Canada's total war cost to at least $7 billion so far."

    Bullshit. If we didn't buy them for this war, we'd be buying them for the next one. As such they should be treated as any other piece of military kit or hardware is when they calculate how much a war is costing us, which is usually ZIP.


    You're right, but so is the $7billion assessment. Either way, that's really not that bad considering we have Annual Surpluses larger than that. From a $ Cost perspective Afghanistan has not been a problem at all.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • WDHIII Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:24 am
  • allan_17 Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:58 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net