Prime Minister Stephen Harper is prepared to ask the Governor General to pull the plug on the minority Parliament and trigger a spring election if the Senate doesn't pass the Harper government's violent-crime bill by March 1.
This is wrong on so many levels. The government serves with the confidence of the HOUSE not the SENATE. Also, this would be a clear end run around their own fixed election dates law.
Errol Mendes, a professor of constitutional and international law at the University of Ottawa.
An attempt to force an election would also violate the constitutional principle of Senate independence, noted Mendes. The Commons has no authority to compel the Senate to pass legislation, he said.
Obviously a LIBRANO hack. I clearly recall from school, a similar impasse in the 30's where an intransigent senate, under the control of a guy called Lansdowne, ammended a bill so outrageously (Lansdowne laundry) that the Commons changed procedure to push it through. If I recall the method is for the returned Bill to be passed three times by the Commons and it bypasses the Senate, and goes for regal assent.
"sasquatch2" said If I recall the method is for the returned Bill to be passed three times by the Commons and it bypasses the Senate, and goes for regal assent.
That isn't the case at all. That's the case in UK with regards to the Lords, however. Constitutional amendments can bypass the Senate, but a bill must be approved by both houses.
I think it would be very ironic for Harper to violate his own law.* Confidence is the Commons' to give or take, not the Senate's.
*Edit, actually, it probably wouldn't. IIRC it was written so it ended up being a mere suggestion.
it will be interesting... thankfully the decision will be made in the east.. ontario,quebec and the maritimes and harper has pissed them all off.. so pay backs a bitch
An attempt to force an election would also violate the constitutional principle of Senate independence, noted Mendes. The Commons has no authority to compel the Senate to pass legislation, he said.
Obviously a LIBRANO hack. I clearly recall from school, a similar impasse in the 30's where an intransigent senate, under the control of a guy called Lansdowne, ammended a bill so outrageously (Lansdowne laundry) that the Commons changed procedure to push it through. If I recall the method is for the returned Bill to be passed three times by the Commons and it bypasses the Senate, and goes for regal assent.
thats right pull the plug... hope the asshole goes down the drain...
Then you would be lonely and have to change your name to Maytag.
too funny.. ziggy...
Your funny too,you remind me of cagerattler but in a smaller version...or Maggiemygosh or allways for Iggy.
What would Michelle Jean do?
too funny.. ziggy...
Your funny too,you remind me of cagerattler but in a smaller version...or Maggiemygosh or allways for Iggy.
sounds like Avro's brother.
too funny.. ziggy...
Your funny too,you remind me of cagerattler but in a smaller version...or Maggiemygosh or allways for Iggy.
sounds like Avro's brother.
At any rate libs like him are good for the conservative party.
If I recall the method is for the returned Bill to be passed three times by the Commons and it bypasses the Senate, and goes for regal assent.
That isn't the case at all. That's the case in UK with regards to the Lords, however. Constitutional amendments can bypass the Senate, but a bill must be approved by both houses.
I think it would be very ironic for Harper to violate his own law.* Confidence is the Commons' to give or take, not the Senate's.
*Edit, actually, it probably wouldn't. IIRC it was written so it ended up being a mere suggestion.