news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Assault Weapons Ban Won't Be In Dems' Gun Bill

Canadian Content
20797news upnews down

Assault Weapons Ban Won't Be In Dems' Gun Bill


Uncle Sam | 207969 hits | Mar 19 11:36 am | Posted by: DanSC
13 Comment

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has decided that a proposed assault weapons ban won't be part of a gun control bill the Senate plans to debate next month, the sponsor of the ban said Tuesday, a decision that means the ban stands little chance of surviva

Comments

  1. by avatar DanSC
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:38 pm
    I'll just leave this here. I expect 100 responses within the hour.

  2. by Thanos
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:53 pm
    Not from me. The Dems knew from the beginning that this had no hope of passing so all of it was nothing but exploitative political grandstanding.

  3. by avatar uwish
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:02 pm
    ***YAWN*** nothing new to see here....old news.

  4. by avatar Xort
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:44 pm
    legislation the Senate will debate next month won't include the provision that gun-control advocates pressed for after an assault-type weapon was used in the Newtown school shootings in December.
    When did a pistol become an assault weapon? Almost all don't even have bayonet lugs, or the ability to fire rifle grenades!

    The second would just be on prohibiting the high-capacity magazine clips.

    It's like reporters never learn, no matter how many times people point out the incorrect technical terms they just keep using them.

  5. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:47 pm
    "uwish" said
    ***YAWN*** nothing new to see here....old news.


    Next up will be to see if Obama tries to do the same thing via an Executive Order. That'll be fun. And by 'fun' I mean not fun.

  6. by avatar Wada
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:53 pm
    Doesn't Obama own all the ammo?

  7. by avatar raydan
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:55 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Next up will be to see if Obama tries to do the same thing via an Executive Order. That'll be fun. And by 'fun' I mean not fun.

    I thought that's what you wanted. :lol:

  8. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:58 pm
    "Wada" said
    Doesn't Obama own all the ammo?


    Congress today opened an inquiry into why the Department of Homeland Security is purchasing a 20-year supply of ammunition.

    http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/congr ... -purchase/

    Congressman Leonard Lance (R-NJ) has come out and demanded that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano explain why the Department of Homeland Security has been engaging in huge amounts of purchases of ammunition over the past year. Rep. Lance has called on Congress to get involved in ascertaining DHS� stockpiling of ammunition which is enough to wage a 20 year plus war, which has most certainly caused a shortage in the public market.

  9. by avatar Wada
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:05 pm
    Yup! Yup! That's the story Bart.

  10. by avatar DanSC
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:10 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Doesn't Obama own all the ammo?


    Congress today opened an inquiry into why the Department of Homeland Security is purchasing a 20-year supply of ammunition.
    Unfortunately, the government's not smart enough to stock up on ammunition when prices are low.

  11. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:20 pm
    Hopefully you guys get the civil war you want sooner rather than later. The waiting must be agony.

  12. by avatar raydan
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:22 pm
    "Gunnair" said
    Hopefully you guys get the civil war you want sooner rather than later. The waiting must be agony.

    Can't wait to pick up the spoils, and by spoils, I mean New Hampshire. :D

  13. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Tue Mar 19, 2013 11:27 pm
    "raydan" said
    Hopefully you guys get the civil war you want sooner rather than later. The waiting must be agony.

    Can't wait to pick up the spoils, and by spoils, I mean New Hampshire. :D

    Williamette Valley in Oregon, if it survives the carnage, is wonderful pinot noir country. And of course, Washington and Oregon will be annexed into Cascadia though the population will likely be a form of Yankee Roma. Maybe we'll ship 'em south to California. Except for the women......I believe we might keep the women.

  14. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:05 am
    "raydan" said
    Hopefully you guys get the civil war you want sooner rather than later. The waiting must be agony.

    Can't wait to pick up the spoils, and by spoils, I mean New Hampshire. :D

    Fine, but whatever you do, don't try to make us take .



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net